Review: Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015 movie)

There’s so much stuffed into this movie that Peter Jackson would probably have turned the same material into six or seven of them, but to the credit of Joss Whedon and company it’s reasonably coherent. I confess I kept figuring out bits and pieces of it long after watching it, and I’m still not clear on who everybody was. (It would help if I still read comics.) I’d probably like it more on a second viewing, as with Cloud Atlas.

Hawkeye, the bow-and-arrow guy, finally gets some actual screen time and character development. He turns out to have a secret life that among other things involves obsessively remodeling his house.
We also get more insight into Bruce Banner (the Hulk when he’s at home) and his complicated relationship with the Black Widow, who has some quite touching scenes that left me and doubtless a lot of other viewers wanting to comfort her, and not merely because she’s played by Scarlett Johansson.

In fact, Johansson wasn’t the only person playing the Black Widow. Since she was pregnant during filming, a number of stunt doubles were hired, and according to Chris Evans (Thor), they looked so much like her that he kept starting conversations with Johansson only to realize that he was talking to one of her doubles. Apparently LA has a considerable stock of Scarlett Johansson clones, which is one of the most thought-provoking bits of news I’ve ever heard this year.

The most interesting new characters are a super-powered brother and sister played by Elizabeth Olsen (younger sister of Mary-Kate and Ashley) and Aaron Taylor-Johnson (the high school student who turned himself into a superhero of sorts in 2010’s Kick-Ass). Olsen and Taylor-Johnson are good friends in real life, having played a married couple in the 2014 version of Godzilla.

James Spader plays Ultron, an artificial intelligence who occupies a series of robot bodies, most of them eight or nine feet tall. The bodies are computer-generated images, but Spader did more than just supply the voice. He acted on-set, and motion-capture was used to make that the basis for the computer imagery.

As an aid to the other actors interacting with him, he wore a rig resembling insect antennae with red balls at the top where his eyes would be in the final film. Elizabeth Olsen said that Spader’s performance was so good that she kept forgetting herself and looking at his actual face rather than where the character’s face would be in the final film. Her friend Taylor-Johnson would helpfully remind her what she was supposed to be doing by yelling, “Red balls! Look at his balls, Lizzie!”

(My guess is that other actors had a roughly parallel problem in scenes involving the Black Widow.)

Ultron was originally meant to create world peace, but after five minutes on the Internet he decides that doing this requires getting rid of all humans.

Stan Lee’s cameo is as a World War II veteran. Lee actually did join the Army, but he never saw combat, instead spending some of his time writing training materials and films and even creating an anti-VD poster. A popular rumor has it that Lee wrote posters that were illustrated by Theodore Geisel (better known as Dr Seuss), but I can’t find confirmation of this, though Geisel was also employed by the Army as a writer and illustrator.

Speaking of trivia, skimming through IMDb’s trivia section on the film I ran across a somewhat cryptic item reading, “During the Iron Man/Hulk fight, the Hulk was originally going to turn grey,” which I initially misread as “turn gay.”

While I didn’t like the film quite as much as I did the first Avengers movie, I recommend it, and it reminded me why I find Marvel more appealing than DC. Near the end, the good guys are trying to save the inhabitants of an Eastern European city facing obliteration. When one of them says he’s not leaving until the civilians are safe, I believed him, and not because he’s a comic book hero but because I understood why his character would feel that way.

Contrast this with, say, Man of Steel, in which Superman does a lot of heroic things but the film and the characters treat the mass slaughter of unnamed residents of Metropolis as little more than passing collateral damage.


Link: https://youtu.be/MZoO8QVMxkk



Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Good guy with a gun

The following segment from Comedy Central’s The Daily Show tries (sometimes successfully) to be funny but also makes some serious points about the notion that the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun. (Caution: Some naughty cable TV language ahead.)

The guy in this video might be deliberately throwing the exercise at the end, but real-world tests tend to go the same way for people with limited training. Here’s a famous example from a 2012 ABC News report:


Link: https://youtu.be/8QjZY3WiO9s

In real life in the U.S., the FBI says that armed civilians do succeed in stopping a bad guy with a gun — in about three percent of shootings — but more often the bad guys are stopped by actual police officers or by unarmed civilians. Armed civilians without training far too often shoot themselves or friends or family members (sometimes intentionally).

My friend Bruce Arthurs wrote an excellent post on the Aurora theater shooting that’s worth reading. His point is that had an audience member been armed the death toll would likely have been higher. Even worse would be a bunch of good guys with guns, strangers to each other, each mistaking the others for additional terrorists. Give guns to enough people and someone wanting to kill a bunch of people wouldn’t need a weapon; it would be enough to point at someone and yell, “Look out! He’s a terrorist with a gun!”

I’m a military veteran who used to carry a sidearm, and when I was doing it actively I was a pretty good shot with a handgun. I’m not in favor of banning guns, which politically just isn’t going to happen anyway, no matter how much those who sell guns try to convince their more gullible customers otherwise.

But it does seem pretty obvious to me that encouraging every random, poorly trained (or untrained) civilian to carry guns anywhere they like to the terror of the public isn’t a smart idea. If you think the Second Amendment guarantees this as a right, you need to do a little reading about its history. A good start would be the first four words of the Amendment itself, which are “A well regulated Militia.” Not “A bunch of unregulated assholes with guns.”



Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Review: The Uninvited (1944 movie)

There are a number of movies (mainly in the horror genre) with the same name (such as the 2008 film reviewed here), but as far as I can tell they’re unrelated except for the title. In this one, an English composer and his sister (Ray Milland and Ruth Hussey) come upon an empty but spacious and appealing seaside house while traveling in Devonshire, and on an impulse they decide to buy it and move in. The owner lives nearby with his grown granddaughter Stella (Gail Russell), who doesn’t want the house to be sold because she had lived there the first three years of her life, up until her mother’s tragic death, and she doesn’t want to lose that link.

Milland and Hussey are sympathetic and after they buy the house they invite her to visit whenever she likes. She proves so appealing that Milland soon finds himself falling in love with her. One day he plays a lovely romantic ballad on the piano and she’s surprised and touched to learn that he wrote it for her, calling it “Stella by Starlight.”

(It was actually written by the film’s composer, Victor Young, and it later became an enduring piece of popular music, especially after it was released with a lyric by Ned Washington in 1946. You can find many versions on YouTube.)

The house proves to be haunted, perhaps by more than one spirit. News of this provokes a strange reaction in Stella’s grandfather, who sends her away to a rest home owned by a strangely menacing woman.

The rest home owner is very well played by Cornelia Otis Skinner, who was at least as well known as an author of books, plays (some of which she also starred in), and a long series of popular humor pieces for The New Yorker. Skinner and her friend Emily Kimbrough wrote a best-selling book about their college trip through Europe called Our Hearts Were Young and Gay that was adapted into a movie.

The Uninvited is a pretty decent ghost story with some nice twists, and I liked it. It’s sometimes said that the 1963 film Charade (starring Cary Grant and Audrey Hepburn) was the best Hitchcock film not directed by Hitchcock, and this movie, while not that good, might be a runner up in the same category. Two of its actors also worked with Hitchcock, most obviously Ray Milland, who starred in Dial M for Murder, but also Alan Napier (the village doctor in this film) who was in at least one episode of the Alfred Hitchcock Presents television series (and is today probably most remembered for playing Batman’s butler Alfred).

Despite the English setting, The Uninvited was shot in California, Britain being rather occupied with World War II at the time.

Incidentally, later the same year Gail Russell (Stella) starred as Cornelia Otis Skinner in the film adaptation of Our Hearts Were Young and Gay, and she appeared in its 1946 sequel as well. In other films she played opposite such major stars as Joel McCrea, Alan Ladd, and John Wayne.

She was beautiful and a pretty decent actress, but she was so shy and unsure of herself that she turned to alcohol to steady her nerves eventually developing a serious drinking problem that damaged her career. One night in 1961, not long after appearing in her first film in three years, she telephoned a radio station to request “Stella by Starlight.” The following day she was found dead in her small studio apartment surrounded by empty liquor bottles. She was 36.


Link: https://youtu.be/siqSUaML-Ig



Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Review: The Great West Detective Agency by Jackson Lowry (2014 novel)

This is the first of a series of wild-west mysteries featuring Lucas Stanton, a guy who gambles for a living and pursues women as a hobby. He’s brave when necessary but otherwise has the good sense to avoid trouble, by running flat out when necessary.

The plot involves Stanton’s being mistaken for a private detective by a woman (gorgeous of course) who offers him a lot of money to look for her lost puppy, which leads to complications involving a corrupt and delusional businessman, a ruthless gang of ex-Confederates planning to conquer their own little empire in Latin America, Russian revolutionaries, and a hidden fortune they’re all looking for.

In the course of things Stanton acquires, more or less by accident, a couple of informants, a multitalented Indian friend, and a husband and wife who insist on becoming the office staff of the detective agency he doesn’t really have, characters who will obviously show up in future novels.

I really like the premise and the characters, but I had some problems with the plot and the style. The story isn’t bad, with some nice twists and surprises and interesting historical references, but as with The Adventures of Brisco County Jr or The Thirty-nine Steps it’s best not to ask too many questions. (Then again, Alfred Hitchcock had little patience for complaints about plot holes, preferring a good yarn to strict logic, or “moronic logic” as I believe he called it.)

The prose is very readable but in spots a bit overwritten, as here:

That night he had found a willing Creole belle with midnight hair spun up in a fancy whirl dotted with pearls, a beguiling accent, and rouged lips that begged to be kissed. He had also found her lover, who carried a colchemarde. The sword cane had a wicked edge and an even deadlier tip, which Lucas avoided only through a spot of luck as the cuckolded lover slipped in the black loamy street in his haste to slay his paramour’s coxcomb.

Style is of course a matter of taste, and this is likely meant to echo the feel of 19th-century fiction, but I personally would have preferred something plainer.

Jackson Lowry is a pen-name of the prolific Bob Vardeman, an acquaintance of mine for many years. His occasional blog can be read here.



Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

English spelling claims another victim

This ends up being funnier than you’d expect because of the dad’s reaction at the end:


Link: https://youtu.be/ZDTMQvi3hnc

The question is a recent viral puzzle related to another one I first heard decades ago: If H-O-U-S-E spells “house” and H-O-R-S-E spells “horse,” what does H-O-U-R-S spell?

What’s particularly interesting here is that the victim finally figures it out only when he writes it down, which illustrates how reading operates at a higher level than recognizing individual letters.



Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Review: Going Clear: Scientology and the Prison of Belief (2015 documentary)

Oscar and Emmy winner Alex Gibney, whose previous documentaries have examined the coverup of child abuse in the Catholic Church and corruption in business and government, takes up Scientology, including its history and its best-known adherents such as Tom Cruise.

It’s based on Pulitzer-Prize-winner Lawrence Wright’s similarly titled 2013 book Going Clear: Scientology, Hollywood, and the Prison of Belief. The film can’t possibly cover as much ground as the book, but it shows things a book cannot, such as rare footage of an interview with Scientology founder L Run Hubbard himself, and it covers a few developments since the book’s publication.

Besides historic footage, Going Clear features recent interviews with former Scientology members and top officials who describe what they say they did and what they say was done to them. It also incorporates a lot of television network news footage despite the networks’ having denied permission. The producers apparently relied on the copyright law doctrine of “Fair Use,” which can be a bit of a risky gray area. I suspect, however—and most likely the producers did as well—that the networks were motivated mainly by a desire to avoid being sued but were otherwise quite happy to see the material used. (HBO, which helped produce the film, reportedly had 160 lawyers involved in the project.)

Scientology has denounced both the book and the film and described several of the former Scientologists interviewed as liars and scoundrels. Some of the people in question have allegedly been subjected to campaigns of harassment (as shown in the film, in fact). Threatened legal action for a while convinced publishers and networks in the UK to delay release of both the book and the documentary (though the film has since been broadcast there).

To a fair extent, though, it appears that Scientology’s campaign has backfired, especially in the U.S. For example, their full-page ads attacking the film in The New York Times and The Los Angeles Times served to spread word of its theatrical release. The ads placed to promote the film were relatively tiny.

After being broadcast on HBO Going Clear received seven Emmy nominations and won in three categories, for Outstanding Documentary or Nonfiction Special, Outstanding Writing for Nonfiction Programming, and Outstanding Directing for Nonfiction Programming. The review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes classified 93% of 74 published reviews as favorable, and 21 reviewers the site considers “top critics” were unanimous in recommending it.


Link: https://youtu.be/zllYkNu1sl4



Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Review: Shadow of a Doubt (1943 movie)

Teresa Wright plays a young woman of about 18 who lives with her parents and much younger brother and sister in Santa Rosa, a small all-American city in northern California. She’s rather bored until her mother’s beloved younger brother, Joseph Cotten, comes for an extended stay.

Wright has always liked her charming and widely-traveled uncle, but gradually she develops suspicions about him, darkly serious suspicions supported by concrete evidence that she dare not talk about with anyone for fear that if they prove true, the news would destroy her mother.

Tension builds slowly but becomes intense, not least because Wright’s character is so likable and her situation so difficult and eventually very dangerous. As for Cotten, I can’t think of another Hitchcock film that so deeply examines one of its characters and the underlying reasons for his actions.

Teresa Wright was unique in having been nominated for an Academy Award in each of her first three films. She won the Best Supporting Actress Oscar for her role as the granddaughter in Mrs Miniver and in this film, her fourth, had top billing over Joseph Cotten. Her acting career lasted until 1997, and she died in 2005.

Her father, a mild-mannered bank employee, is played by Henry Travers, best known for his role as Clarence the angel in It’s a Wonderful Life. Hume Cronyn (made up to look older than he really was at the time) is the father’s eccentric best friend.

According to a documentary about the film, it was Cronyn’s first screen role, and he said that during production in Santa Rosa a little girl ran up to him to get his autograph, the very first he’d ever been asked for. When returned her autograph book she examined at his signature, then looked up and him and commanded, “Hurry up and get famous!”

The heroine’s younger sister is a similarly no-nonsense little girl played by Edna May Wonacott, the real-life daughter of a Santa Rosa grocer. Hitchcock had noticed her waiting at a bus stop when he was scouting locations and thought she had the perfect studious look for the part. She had no acting experience, not even in a school play, and her only training was a bit of coaching by Hitchcock’s daughter Patricia, but she’s quite good and went on to play similar parts in a few other films over the course of a decade.

The heroine’s best friend (the one who casts a rather predatory leer on Joseph Cotten when they’re introduced) was another Santa Rosa resident named Estelle Jewell. Other minor characters were played by locals as well.

The mother, Joseph Cotten’s sister, is played by Patricia Collinge, an Irish-born actress whom Teresa Wright had previously worked with in The Little Foxes. Macdonald Carey is an undercover policed detective investigating Cotten who develops an attraction to the heroine.

Wright wasn’t happy with a scene in the script that had Carey confess his romantic feelings to her because she thought they way it played out wasn’t believable, so she sought Collinge’s opinion and found she agreed with her. Wright took this up with Hitchcock and suggested he let Collinge — a successful short-story author as well as an actor — rewrite the scene, and he accepted her advice. (In fact, Hitchcock often welcomed ideas from the cast and crew, as did Orson Welles. So much for the notion of the director as auteur.) He liked Collinge’s help enough that he later brought her in as a script doctor on Lifeboat.

The story for Shadow of a Doubt was proposed by Gordon McDonell. The script was by Thornton Wilder (best known of course for his play Our Town) with revisions by Sally Benson and by Hitchcock’s wife, Alma Reville, as well as by Collinge, though Collinge received no on-screen writing credit.

Another amusing tidbit from the documentary: During a break in production the cast and crew organized a gin rummy tournament and invited Hitchcock to participate. He said he didn’t know the game but would play if someone would teach him how. Someone did, and Hitchcock won the tournament. I suspect this inspired his cameo in the film as a card player.


Link: https://youtu.be/jQ83eNpGaKQ



Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Parents pointlessly endangering kids (and adults)

Pediatrician Dr Aaron Carroll has an important message below on how parents and even doctors are endangering young people (and their adults selves) by not immunizing them for HPV. Contrary to crank Internet rumors and a couple of scientifically illiterate presidential candidates, extensive evidence shows the HPV vaccine to be quite safe and effective and life-saving.

But many parents apparently don’t know to ask for the vaccine, and worse, doctors don’t push for it as much as they should. And that’s dumb, because a lot more adolescents are harmed by HPV than by, say, terrorists or school shootings. (That last point is from me, not Dr Carroll, but I’m pretty sure the numbers back me up on it. Lots of people, male and female, get cancer as a result of an HPV infection, and mass killings, horrendous as they are, affect relatively few people.)


Link: https://youtu.be/ducC8kRJDyw

As he mentions in the video, Carroll has made similar points several times in the past. More than two years ago he devoted one of the first episodes of Healthcare Triage to the subject of insufficient use of the vaccine.

Months ago he devoted a briefer segment to a study (more recent than the one mentioned in previous video) clearly demonstrating that getting vaccinated doesn’t make girls more sexually reckless as some parents mistakenly fear. It seems astonishing that parents would put their children’s lives at greater risk just to try to scare them into not having sex, but to put it mildly, people don’t always think things through. In any event, if parents think they can scare their kids into chastity, there are plenty of other STIs to worry about.

Incidentally, the same video mentions the false belief some people have that they can contract influenza from a flu vaccine. Some researchers did an experiment to see if they could educate people on this, and the results were bizarre: A significant number of patients did lose their false fear of flu vaccines. But then they perversely became less inclined to get vaccinated! People are just nuts.

Another Healthcare Triage video that briefly mentions HPV vaccine notes that its use improved from 2013 to 2014, and a map included shows that the vaccination rate in my state, North Carolina, is among the highest in the country for girls and among the better states for boys.



Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather