Unintended consequences of new NC law

(Update 2016 March 28: The McCrory administration has produced a press release seriously misrepresenting the import on the law. More in this later post.)

(Update 2016 March 26: It turns out the new law also contains a provision canceling a long-established right to sue employers for any type of workplace discrimination (on the basis of race, gender, religion, etc.) in state court. People can still bring a civil rights action in federal court, of course, but that’s a lot more expensive, and there are a lot fewer federal courts. See this article at Talking Points Memo for more.)

As you may have read, the Republican-controlled North Carolina legislature held a one-day session for the sole purpose of passing a new law invalidating anti-discrimination and minimum-wage ordinances passed by localities. (For more details see for example this report.)

What particularly excited the legislators was the fact under a recent Charlotte ordinance, transgendered persons would be permitted to use the restroom of their gender identity. This is what happens in the real world most of the time anyway, and plenty of places in the U.S. the law explicitly permits it with no resulting problems.

In North Carolina, however, the new law requires people in state and local government buildings to choose a men’s or women’s restroom that corresponds to their sex as specified on their birth certificate, regardless how they dress or appear. People who have had a sex change can often get the birth certificate updated, but that depends on where they were born and it often doesn’t happen. Unless you’re a Republican legislator in North Carolina, you can see the obvious problem.

Here’s a picture of a man named J.P. Sheffield (Twitter handle @JayShef). Mr Sheffield”s birth certificate identifies him as female. So under the new North Carolina law, he has to start using the ladies’ room:

Transgender man JP Sheffield now required to use women's rooms in NC

Transgender man JP Sheffield now required to use women’s rooms in NC

Great job, legislature!

(Updated 2016 May 8 to clarify that the restroom provisions apply only in state and local government buildings.)

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather


Unintended consequences of new NC law — 4 Comments

  1. Pingback: McCrory administration misrepresents new NC law | D Gary Grady

  2. Pingback: NASCAR, and a reminder about what NC’s “bathroom” law really does | D Gary Grady

  3. Pingback: NC’s “bathroom law” doesn’t even do what its supporters think it does | D Gary Grady

  4. Pingback: The latest on North Carolina’s bathroom bill | D Gary Grady

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments are moderated, which can take up to a day (rarely even two), so please be patient. I welcome agreement, disagreement, and corrections on anything from substance to spelling. I try to weed out spam and anything defamatory or pointlessly insulting (to anybody), unless of course I think it's really funny.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.