Gorilla intrigued by photos on a smart phone

I once read of a study in which a chimpanzee was tasked with sorting photographs based on the categories of the objects depicted and placed a photograph of a chimp on the pile of pictures of people.

So apparently at least some primates, unlike many other animals, can grasp the notion of a photograph. Here a western lowland gorilla at the Louisville Zoo seems interested by photographs on a cell phone, including images of other gorillas. In some shots the human and the gorilla appear to be sitting together, but there is glass separating them.


Link: https://youtu.be/aPPq7o7TzIs

Probably half the people who have looked at this have thought of making a joke about Gorilla Glass.



Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Some of the best short bits from season two of Last Week Tonight with John Oliver

To start this morning today, here right now are some highlights from Last Week Tonight, which will return from a couple of weeks’ hiatus tomorrow evening.

(Apologies if the preceding sentence disrupts the flow of time around you. In my defense, HBO’s web page for the show has an item headed “Watch the Previous Weeks’ Last Week Tonights” and that’s not much better than what I wrote.)


Link: https://youtu.be/WVL67LCioNY

Incidentally, HBO isn’t paying me (or even giving me free HBO) to keep talking about Last Week Tonight with John Oliver. (Figure dem odds, as an old Navy buddy of mine used to say.) I just think it’s one of the best investigative journalism shows on television on top of being entertaining.



Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Music around the world

My brother Mark sent me a link to this nifty video of people singing and playing “Sittin on the Dock of the Bay” around the world:


Link: https://youtu.be/Es3Vsfzdr14
More from Playing for Change: https://www.youtube.com/user/PlayingForChange/videos

It reminds me of these joyful, inspiring dancing videos from Seattle’s Matt Harding:


(2008) Link: https://youtu.be/zlfKdbWwruY


(2012) Link: https://youtu.be/Pwe-pA6TaZk

More from Matt Harding: https://www.youtube.com/user/mattharding2718/videos



Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Red State Update on that Kentucky county clerk

This is even funnier than you’d expect it to be. Where else would you see ads from Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis’s political opponent last year, whose actual campaign slogan I hesitate to repeat?


Link: https://youtu.be/FM4mJ493wNU

Getting serious for a second, and with apologizes for partly repeating myself, a few points to keep in mind:

  • Kim Davis didn’t just personally refuse to issue same-sex marriage licenses, she ordered her entire staff to stop issuing all marriage licenses, though some deputy clerks apparently wanted to issue them. What about their freedom of religion, or for that matter that of county residents wanting to get married (only a few of whom are same-sex couples)?
  • If Davis were to convert to Islam and order her staff to follow Shariah law, would her defenders still think she was merely exercising her First Amendment rights?
  • Kentucky law gives county clerks responsibility for issuing marriage licenses. The Kentucky penal code states that “A public servant is guilty of official misconduct in the first degree when, with intent … to deprive another person of a benefit, he knowingly … Refrains from performing a duty imposed upon him by law or clearly inherent in the nature of his office …” (quoted from KRS 522.020; here is a link to a PDF of the Kentucky Criminal Law Manual if you want to read the whole thing in context.) Since a “public servant” is defined as (among other things) “Any public officer or employee of the state or of any political subdivision thereof or of any governmental instrumentality within the state;” it appears that by ordering her deputy clerks not to issue any marriage licenses, Davis was instructing them to commit a crime for which they could be fined and/or sentenced to up to a year’s imprisonment.
  • The federal judge who held her in contempt made it clear that Davis can get out of jail simply by agreeing not to interfere with her staff’s performance of their legal duties.

(Updated a bit 2015 September 8, as usual to tweak the wording in an effort to improve clarity.)



Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

PPP survey finds many Republicans mistakenly think that Obama wasn’t born in U.S. but Canada-born Ted Cruz was

I’ve long argued that political disagreements often result less from difference of opinion than from differing notions of the facts. There are a lot of bogus ideas floating around across the political spectrum.

I just saw a remarkable example of this in the results of a recent survey from Public Policy Polling, an outfit based here in North Carolina with a pretty good track record. (This link takes you to a 138-page PDF with the complete results. See in particular questions 28 through 30.)

Some 572 “usual Republican primary voters” (which I think means people who say they usually vote in Republican primaries, a group commonly called the “Republican base”) were asked whether President Obama and Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) were born in the United States. Obama was of course born in Honolulu and Cruz in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. The reported margin of error is 4.1 percent. The disappointing results:

Only 29 percent of the Republican voters surveyed correctly said that Obama was born in the U.S. versus 44 percent who said that he was not. (The rest indicated that they weren’t sure.)

In addition, only 22 percent correctly said that Ted Cruz was born outside the country versus 40 percent who got it wrong.

A few years ago Hawaii officials released a photocopy of Obama’s original “long-form” birth certificate, which is bound into a volume in a vault in the records office in Honolulu. The copy was formally certified by the head of the office, who publicly expressed hope that this would finally put the matter to rest.

It’s also worth noting that both of the daily newspapers published in Honolulu in 1961 reported Obama’s birth in their vital records columns. (Back then it was routine for newspapers to publish such listings, which were supplied by government offices.) These papers are archived on microfilm in public and academic libraries all over the U.S. and in other countries. And why in the world would his young mother, a not-very-rich student, have spent a huge amount of money to travel overseas to give birth away from family and friends? In short, there’s no way Obama wasn’t born in Hawaii.

Ted Cruz was born to an American mother and a Cuban father, but unlike Obama he really was born outside the U.S., specifically in Calgary, Alberta, and did not move to the United States until he was four years old, as he has himself confirmed. Because his mother was American, he was a natural-born U.S. citizen from birth despite being born in another country. His place of birth made Cruz a Canadian citizen as well, but last year he formally renounced his Canadian citizenship to deal with suggestions that this might disqualify him from running for president.

(Incidentally, you might wonder if he also inherited his father’s Cuban citizenship, but from what I’ve read, under Cuban law he did not.)

It’s a little discouraging that in both cases the Republican voters answering correctly were greatly outnumbered by the ones getting it wrong, but at least enough people admitted not knowing that the fraction in error did not reach 50 percent.

Another disappointment: When asked in the same poll whether they believed Barack Obama was a Christian or a Muslim, a solid majority of 54 percent of the Republican voters surveyed said that he was Muslim, another 32 percent said they weren’t sure, and only 14 percent identified him as Christian. There is of course not the slightest evidence that Obama is a Muslim and quite a lot that he’s a Christian.

Incidentally, I don’t mean to suggest that misconceptions are found only on the right-hand side of the political spectrum. Democrats seem about as likely as Republicans to have misconceptions about Social Security, for example, and while I might be mistaken, my impression is that anti-vaccination types are a bit more common on the left.

Update: Or maybe not. While there are for example concentrations of unvaccinated children in politically left-leaning areas of California, I’ve also been reminded that some Republican presidential candidates in the current campaign (see e.g. this later post) and the last (Michele Bachmann being the most obvious example) made demonstrably false assertions about vaccines, something I can’t recall hearing from a major Democratic figure. If anyone knows of an opinion survey showing cross-tabs for political affiliation and mistaken beliefs about vaccines I’d be interested in learning of it.

Also, lots and lots of people have seriously wrong notions about the views of people outside their own groups. For example, a lot of progressive Democrats seem not to realize that many Republicans were just as outraged as they were about the government bank bailouts initiated by the Bush administration in the latter part of 2008.

(Updated 2015 Sep 6 and Sep 12 for clarity and to remove some excess verbosity and a dumb typo and Sep 20 to acknowledge some uncertainty in my impression that anti-vaccine nonsense is more common on the political left.)



Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Quick thoughts on that Kentucky county clerk

As pretty much everybody has heard, the clerk of Rowan County Kentucky, Kim Davis, is now in jail and her office has resumed issuing marriage licenses. Here are a few interesting facts you might have missed about the case:

While Davis objected specifically to same-sex marriage, she had blocked anyone in her office from issuing marriage licenses altogether (not just for same-sex couples) and as a result was sued by both straight and gay couples.

According to Shannon Ragland of The Kentucky Trial Court Review, County Attorney Cecil Watkins said that deputy clerks who had wanted to follow the law and issue marriage licenses did not do so because they were afraid of Davis. In court yesterday all deputy clerks except Davis’s son promised to follow the law, though at least one expressed personal opposition to same-sex marriage and said it was very difficult for her.

U.S. District Court Judge David Bunning, who found Davis in contempt, nonetheless told her he would not send her to jail if she would simply agree not to interfere with her office’s compliance with the law. She refused.

Judge Bunning, appointed by George W Bush, is a native of Kentucky and son of Jim Bunning, a Hall of Fame major league pitcher who also served 1999-2011 as a Republican U.S. senator from that state. Judge Bunning told Davis in court that as a Roman Catholic he has strong religious views as well, but like her he had take an oath to abide by the law, not impose his personal beliefs on others. Since ruling against Davis he has reportedly received death threats and is under the protection of U.S. marshals.

It’s worth noting that while Davis and her supporters claim her religious liberty is being violated, her attempt to impose her personal views on an entire county suggests that she’s less concerned about the religious liberty of other people.

Davis, a Democrat, was last elected to her post in 2014. Her term runs through 2019. As an elected official she cannot be removed from office except by impeachment, so unless she resigns or agrees to obey the law and her oath of office, she could remain in jail more than three years until her term expires.

She might face additional jail time as well. Davis’s refusal to follow court orders and the directives of the state’s governor appears to constitute first degree official misconduct under the Kentucky Penal Code, which prescribes a $500 fine and a year in jail for any official who “refrains from performing a duty imposed upon him by law or clearly inherent in the nature of his office.”

According to US News and World Report and other sources, Davis is currently on her fourth marriage. A few months after her first marriage ended she gave birth to twins fathered by a different man. She then married a second husband (who adopted the twins) but divorced him to marry a third husband, the twins’ biological father, only to divorce him and remarry her second husband. However, all this was apparently before she joined the Apostolic Church, a Pentecostal denomination.

I’m not the first person to ask this, but how would the folks defending Davis react to an official who, for personal religious reasons, and in violation of the law, blocked the issuing of pistol or concealed-carry permits?



Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

The Daily Show on Obamacare last year

In a post yesterday I mentioned Betsy McCaughey (pronounced McCoy), the former New York lieutenant governor best known for spreading falsehoods about the Affordable Care Act back in 2009. Here she is (very, very briefly) in a segment from Comedy Central’s The Daily Show broadcast 2014 September 11 (running time five minutes):

Incidentally, I still encounter people who complain that Obamacare premiums are too high. If so, the blame should go to the private insurance companies that set the rates. (The federal government does not, though state insurance departments often have a say.) Premiums are actually lower than projected when the law was passed and in line with those for group insurance policies. Moreover, the great majority of people who buy the coverage pay less than the full price because they qualify for subsidies based on their income.



Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Health Triage on advance directives

Here’s another short video (about five minutes) from pediatrician and author Dr Aaron Carroll, this time talking about the importance of getting written down in advance your personal preferences about end-of-life care, well in advance of a medical crisis, and ideally after discussing it with your doctor. He also talks about why Medicare still won’t pay for this.


Link: https://youtu.be/bbYhRUIMAhk

A few additional points:

Thanks to a change in the law initiated many years ago by a Republican member of Congress, Medicare has long reimbursed doctors for discussing with patients their options for end-of-life care, but only after a patient has been diagnosed with a terminal illness or is near death. Otherwise, if you wanted to see your doctor for advice in preparing a living will while you were still healthy, you had to pay out of pocket.

There’s one partial exception: Since 2005 Medicare has encouraged doctors to offer patients an initial 30-minute “Welcome to Medicare” visit within six months of signing up for Medicare Part B, and while the visit is supposed to focus on a physical exam, medical history, risk factors, preventive care, and planning, advanced directives can in theory come up, time permitting. (Note, however, that neither this description of the “Welcome to Medicare” visit for patients nor this one for doctors mentions the subject.) Medicare still won’t pay for a visit specifically to get advice on preparing an advanced directive until a patient is approaching death.

The 2009 proposal Carroll refers to would have expanded this slightly to let Medicare pay for such doctor visits even while patients were healthy, up to once every five years. But because it was part of the House version of the Affordable Care Act, opponents looking for ways to attack the bill picked up on the proposed modest change as a way to scare the public into thinking care would be rationed. They incorrectly claimed the that it would actually require doctors to discuss end-of-life decisions with their patients at least once every five years. One source of this misrepresentation was Betsy McCaughey, a former lieutenant governor of New York turned right-wing political pundit, who made a number of questionable attacks on healthcare reform, including a claim that the House bill promoted “euthanasia for the elderly” and “would make it mandatory” that doctors tell their Medicare patients “how to end their lives sooner.” This was a blatant misrepresentation, but at least it had some weak connection to reality.

Much worse were the bizarre rumors of “death panels,” supposedly empowered to decide whether people were “worth” having their lives saved. The Mad Cow Zero for that claim was Sarah Palin, and for all I know Palin may even have believed it, at least initially. But it’s pretty clear that a lot of politicians and political hacks kept repeating what PolitiFact called the “Lie of the Year” even after it had been thoroughly debunked. Indeed, some have kept at it, and almost a fourth of Republicans believe them.

In the video above Carroll suggests that Medicare may soon finally adopt the change, as it should have done years ago. For a supporting view see this July 10 editorial from the Minneapolis Star-Tribune.



Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather