All you need to know about investing (or most of it anyway)

This eight-minute clip from PBS NewsHour does a pretty good job of synopsizing when people need to know about investing:


Link: https://youtu.be/JdUKhgW1gOo

An even shorter version would be to invest as much as you can in a tax-sheltered retirement or college savings account, preferably one offered through your employer if available. Roth IRAs are a good choice for retirement accounts. The best thing to hold in the account is usually a low-cost index fund that invests in a broadly diversified set of investments, such as a target retirement fund. Especially if you invest outside a retirement account, an exchange-traded fund (ETF) is usually a good choice and can have tax advantages.

Besides long-term investing you should have short-term savings, ideally enough to live on for six months or more, plus a down payment if you’re hoping to buy a house. Pay off credit cards. Otherwise you’re just giving away money to a bank. Borrow money only to buy a reasonably safe asset such as a house or a (not too expensive) car you need to get around.

Actually, there’s more to it than that, including how to avoid scams, including from your seemingly friendly bank. The advice in the video is good, but you ought to spend a little time reading about personal finance from mainstream authors. Just be sure to avoid get-rich-quick schemes like the “Trump University” scam.



Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

John Oliver on Confederate monuments and remembering history

Here’s yet another excellent segment from HBO’s Last Week Tonight with John Oliver, this one about Confederate monuments and their connection to history. As usual he makes interesting points, and he does so very entertainingly. If you don’t want to watch the whole thing, skip ahead to the 19 minute mark. Oliver’s suggestions for new monuments in excellent:


Link: https://youtu.be/J5b_-TZwQ0I

Oliver makes a point I’ve made before myself (but of course he does it better): People who think that relocating the statues amounts to “erasing history” might want to reflect on how Confederate monuments themselves distort history by celebrating the people defending slavery and not those who fought against it, not to mention the slaves themselves.



Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Trump’s latest order really could destroy the individual health insurance market

Today President Trump signed a new executive order that would, once fully implemented, allow a lot of people to obtain cheaper but lousier health insurance. (Actually, as you can see in this clip, he almost forgot to sign it, but someone reminded him.) If you’re currently healthy and don’t think you will get seriously sick, this sounds pretty positive. After all, who wouldn’t want to save money, and isn’t choice a good thing? For people who are lucky enough to stay healthy, maybe, if you overlook the bigger federal deficit or higher taxes. For those who do get injured or sick, it’s a disaster, though exactly how big a disaster is hard to say, because a lot of details remain to be determined. The policy probably won’t be implemented for many months if at all.

But in the worse case scenario — which isn’t all that far fetched — the order could make decent individual insurance impossible to buy for many people with pre-existing conditions.

For an outline of the order does and reactions to it, see this report (text and audio) from NPR’s Scott Horsley. See also the following report on PBS News Hour, which puts the action in the broader context of Trump’s other efforts to sabotage the Affordable Care Act, such as drastically cutting the enrollment period for individual policies (which this year ends in mid-December rather than running through January as in the past):


Link: https://youtu.be/CHbWYm3IiLg

Journalist and blogger Kevin Drum praised outlets with analyses addressing the dangers of the policy, with headlines that bluntly summarize the negative assessment:

  • “Foiled in Congress, Trump Signs Order to Undermine Obamacare” (The New York Times)
  • “Trump begins Obamacare dismantling with executive order” (CNN)
  • “Trump signs order to eliminate ACA insurance rules, undermine marketplaces” (The Washington Post)

Drum sees a strategy behind this: “Trump’s plan, obviously, is that this chaos will force Congress to respond. Anything will be better than a collapse of the entire individual market. Even Democrats will be forced to support a Republican plan that will at least prevent the market from imploding.” Maybe. Or maybe Trump really does believe he’s arranging a way for people to buy cheaper insurance and doesn’t realize the real-world consequences. Some time ago Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo proposed what came to be known as “Trump’s Razor,” a rule of thumb that roughly says that the stupidest explanation for Trump’s actions are the most likely to be true.

Finally, here’s something from Seth Meyers broadcast on Trump’s 100th day in office. (I previously posted it back in April.) Just watch the first four minutes, which are full of a whole series Trump clips from the campaign that sound exactly like he’s describing himself. Seriously, if you didn’t see it before, watch it. It’s definitely worth four minutes of your time.


Link: https://youtu.be/JPaodrB8T8Y



Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

More consequences of Trump’s Obamacare sabotage

Yesterday Kevin Drum pointed out two more examples of the results of Trump’s efforts to sabotage Obamacare, mainly by hinting he will refuse to permit the legally required cost sharing reduction payments to be made but refusing to say definitely. In California insurance companies are being required to put a 12.5 percent surcharge on Silver plan premiums to deal with the problem (though in the end this will effect only the highest income 20 percent or so whose premiums aren’t subsidized), while in New Hampshire, where the individual market had stabilized, next year’s policies will be much worse in terms of out-of-pocket spending, which premium subsidies won’t cover. Drum concludes,

And by the way: even if Trump succeeds in destroying Obamacare, it’s still the law of the land. Insurers will still be required to insure anyone who asks for coverage, regardless of pre-existing conditions. That’s untenable, and the only response from the insurance industry will be to eliminate individual insurance coverage completely. Somebody on Capitol Hill better cotton to this pretty quick and—somehow—get Trump to lay off. If the Republican Party literally ends up eliminating the entire individual health insurance market, there aren’t words in the dictionary for how big a loss they’ll suffer in 2020.

For what it’s worth, I previously posted about this on September 2, October 3, and October 9. I’m surprised it isn’t getting more coverage in the national news media.



Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

The vice president’s pet bunny has a book coming out

Vice President Mike Pence and his wife have a pet rabbit named Marlon Bundo, who apparently has written a children’s books about how the vice president spends his days.

I hope the bunny mentions Pence’s political stunt of spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to fly in Air Force 2 from Las Vegas to California via Indianapolis just so he could walk out of a football game in protest of players kneeling in during the National Anthem to express sorrow about unnecessary police violence. The bunny could also suggest to the vice president that if he thinks the players are disrespecting the flag by kneeling before it, he could express his disrespect for the players by kneeling in front of them.

Anyway, here Jimmy Kimmel has excerpts from a version of the book that may not be the one sold in bookstores:


Link: https://youtu.be/LPIxZ_UvPRU



Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

No, the opioid epidemic isn’t Medicaid’s fault

One of the nuttier recent political notions is that addiction to opioid pain relievers and related drugs can be blamed on Medicaid, and more specifically the Medicaid expansion introduced by the Affordable Care Act.

It seems somewhat plausible, I supposed, that people with no health insurance have a harder time seeing a doctor or paying for prescription pain relievers and hence don’t get addicted. But what this obviously overlooks is that people suffering chronic pain who can’t afford a doctor or prescription drugs may turn to street drugs out of desperation.

What we should really be looking at is the evidence, as Dr Aaron Carroll does succinctly in this six-minute video:


Link: https://youtu.be/EQy5ef7CLfo



Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Thanks to Trump, insurance premiums will jump for many in 2018

Apologies for two posts in a row about this (with a gap of time between them; I’ve been a bit ill), but it appears that Trump’s efforts to undermine the Affordable Care Act are leading to a large jump in insurance costs next year in several states, though the great majority of people won’t see their rates increase at all. The difference will be covered by taxpayers and by families making over 400 percent of the poverty line.

Briefly, here’s what’s going on:

Under the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), lower-income working people who get individual or family policies through the exchanges can qualify for reduced co-insurance and copays, provided they pay for at least a Silver-level insurance policy. Under the law, insurance companies have to give these discounts, and in return the law requires the federal government to reimburse the companies. These reimbursements are called “cost-sharing reduction payments.”

The Trump administration has been threatening to stop making these payments, justifying that by saying the ACA doesn’t explicitly allocate funds for them. That is, it requires that the payments be made, but it doesn’t contain additional, separate language saying the payments can be made. This is an arcane legal argument and at worse may represent a wording error, but the intent of Congress to authorize and require the payments is clear. Moreover, members of both parties, including Republican critics of Obamacare, have made clear they want to payments to continue, but so far Congress hasn’t acted to make clear that the administration must keep making the payments.

If the administration does follow through on its threats, then the insurance companies will still be required to make the payments, but the money will have to come from somewhere. In order to have enough funds, companies in several states are sharply raising premiums next year, and they’ve made it clear that this is the reason.

About 80 percent of people with individual policies get subsidies to help pay the premiums. The amount of the subsidy is computed by subtracting a percentage of their income from the cost of the second-least-expensive Silver insurance policy available in their area. If the premium for that policy rises, the subsidy rises along with it so their cost for the policy never exceeds that percentage of their income.

But if they make more than 400 percent of the poverty line, they get no subsidy at all. (In my opinion this is dumb and ought to be changed to a tapering of the subsidy, not a sharp cutoff.)

So roughly 20 percent of people buying policies on the individual market will see a major price increase next year caused by the Trump administration. Of course, the administration hopes the public won’t realize this and will believe twaddle about how Obamacare is supposedly “imploding.” In fact, the administration and its allies in Congress are flat out lying about this.

For more on this see Ed Kilgore’s piece here. See also these two earlier posts from this blog:

Trump is still undermining Obamacare (October 3)

How the Trump administration is still trying to sabotage Obamacare (September 2)



Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Trump is still undermining Obamacare

I’m sorry to keep harping on this, but the Trump administration is still doing what it can to damage the Affordable Care Act at a major cost to people who need health insurance, and so far the news media have said little about that in comparison with the wall-to-wall coverage of (fortunately unsuccessful) Republican efforts in Congress to “repeal and replace.”

Editor emeritus Charlie Peters at The Washington Monthly has often complained that the Washington media focus on Congress and the White House and ignore what’s actually going on in the great bulk of government, which probably helps explain the relative lack of attention to the administration’s Obamacare sabotage.

In fairness, there has been coverage, just not as much as we might hope. Back in July, for example The New York Times published an article (updated last week) entitled “4 Ways Trump Is Weakening Obamacare, Even After Repeal Plan’s Failure.”

The annual enrollment period to sign up for individual coverage is being cut in half this year, and the already modest budget for letting people know about this and other matters is being slashed by 90 percent. There’s still a chance Trump may follow through on his threat to withhold legally required “cost sharing reduction” payments, creating uncertainty in the insurance industry and forcing them to raise rates, though even conservative members of Congress have opposed him on this.

This morning Kevin Drum asked in a blog post, “Why Is Trump’s Scorched-Earth Campaign to Destroy Obamacare Getting So Little Attention?” and referencing a blog post yesterday by Andrew Sprung. Sprung points out in passing that the administration is also hurting Medicaid. But as Sprung says, things could still be much worse.

CBO’s updated projections for the ACA marketplace are reduced from past years, but CBO forecasts a stable marketplace at more-or-less current levels. Net, CBO forecasts 3 million more uninsured by 2026 than it forecast last year, pre-Trump, pre-sabotage The individual market core is insulated by the subsidy structure, though sabotage with its attendant rate hikes and curtailed participation by insurers hurts upwards of ten million subsidy-ineligible people. Trump’s threatened executive order could further intensify adverse selection in the marketplace — but again, roughly ten million subsidy-eligible enrollees would be insulated.

That justifies hope but not ignoring what’s going on. As I mentioned a month ago, a Kaiser Family Foundation survey found that by 78 to 17 percent, people want the administration to do what they can to make the Affordable Care Act work rather than try to make it fail. Even among Trump supporters, 51 to 39 want them to try to make it work. A lot of people would presumably be disturbed to learn what’s going on but aren’t hearing enough about it. There’s more about this in my post from August 14.



Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Bully simulator

The clip below is six minutes of highlights from a “Bully simulator” video game as played by Fafa and Mario. Fafa is a groundhog puppet, Mario is a red puppet, and they are the lead characters on the Globe and Boots and Glove and Boots Gaming YouTube channels. I think they’re pretty funny, but of course your mileage may vary.


Link: https://youtu.be/tINcNr10kBs

If you want to see the full hour+ of gameplay from which the bits above were extracted, here’s the whole thing. By the way, the opening screen last 45 seconds, so feel free to skip past it.)


Link: https://youtu.be/goDQBl0QSzo



Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather