(Washington) Post-mortem on the contrived debt ceiling crisis

From what I hear from people who read it a lot more often than I do, The Washington Post, did a less-than-excellent job reporting on the debt ceiling mess when it was still an issue. But a week and a half ago it published an analysis that belatedly explains just how the crisis was engineered. In brief:

The frantic showdown that followed, bringing the nation to the brink of default, looked like the haphazard escalation of a typical partisan standoff.

It wasn’t.

It's said that in practice a lunatic driving a junk car has right-of-way. That was the position of newly elected Tea Party Republicans toward the country's obligations to creditors, Social Security recipients, and others to whom we owe money. The Republicans in question assumed (correctly, as it turned out) that Obama and the Democrats would yield to avoid the risk that the extremists woud follow through on their threat to harm the country. So those Republicans, by simply making it clear that they didn't particularly give a damn default, eventually got most of what they wanted, damaging as it is. (To be charitable, it's apparent that a lot of them actually think they did the right thing, because they simply don't know any better.)

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments are moderated, which can take up to a day (rarely even two), so please be patient. I welcome agreement, disagreement, and corrections on anything from substance to spelling. I try to weed out spam and anything defamatory or pointlessly insulting (to anybody), unless of course I think it's really funny.